Home / Programs /
Understanding General Reconstruction in Plastic Surgery for General Practitioners (Copy)
Understanding General Reconstruction in Plastic Surgery for General Practitioners (Copy)
Area of Interest, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Educational Activities (EA)
130.0
Reviewing Performance (RP)
120.0
Measuring Outcomes (MO)
190.0
Brief Overview
This educational activity provides general practitioners with a foundational understanding of common general reconstructive surgical procedures. It aims to demystify complex reconstructive options, highlight conditions amenable to reconstruction, and equip GPs with the knowledge to effectively counsel patients, manage pre- and post-operative care, and facilitate appropriate referral pathways to plastic and reconstructive surgeons.
Program Details

Expanded Knowledge: Develop a comprehensive understanding of the indications, principles, and common techniques in general reconstructive surgery relevant to their practice, including the expected patient journey.

Enhanced Skills: Improve their ability to accurately assess patients for reconstructive needs, provide relevant pre- and post-operative counselling, and manage basic post-surgical care.

Improved Attitudes: Foster a more confident and collaborative approach to managing patients who may require or have undergone reconstructive surgery, promoting timely referrals and effective primary care support. 

Our activity will help participants develop skills in measuring outcomes by providing them with hands-on experience using GP work data. For example, participants will analyze a dataset containing:

  • Patient Visits: 500 patient visits over 3 months

  • Treatment Outcomes: 80% recovery rate for minor illnesses, 15% referral to specialists, 5% follow-up required

  • Prescriptions: 300 prescriptions issued, with adherence rate of 90%

  • Patient Feedback Scores: Average satisfaction score of 4.2/5

Using this data, participants will:

  1. Learn to calculate key performance metrics such as recovery rates, adherence, and patient satisfaction.

  2. Identify trends or patterns to improve clinical decision-making.

  3. Compare outcomes against best practice benchmarks to highlight areas needing improvement.

  4. Practice interpreting data to make evidence-based recommendations for patient care.

By engaging with realistic GP work data, participants will build confidence in outcome measurement and gain practical insights into quality improvement.

The activity will encourage participants to actively analyse and utilise feedback by incorporating structured reflection exercises. For example:

  • Patient Feedback: Participants will review sample patient survey data (e.g., communication score 3.8/5, waiting time score 3.2/5, overall satisfaction 4.1/5) and identify key themes for service improvement.

  • Peer Feedback: Small group discussions will be used where peers provide constructive feedback on case presentations, highlighting both strengths and areas for growth.

  • Self-Reflection: Participants will complete a short reflective journal after each session, noting what went well, what could be improved, and how they plan to apply new approaches in practice.

Through this process, participants will:

  1. Learn to interpret feedback objectively rather than defensively.

  2. Develop strategies to turn feedback into actionable improvements.

  3. Strengthen their ability to engage in continuous professional development by combining external feedback with self-reflection.

This ensures that feedback becomes a tool for performance enhancement rather than just evaluation.

Program Outcome

GPs often encounter patients who may benefit from reconstructive surgery or are managing its aftermath, but they may lack a clear understanding of the types of reconstruction available, what outcomes to expect, or optimal referral pathways. This activity addresses the need for GPs to be better informed to identify suitable candidates for referral, provide effective pre- and post-operative care, and manage patient expectations. It aims to bridge the knowledge gap between primary care and specialist plastic surgery, leading to more timely and appropriate patient management.

By completing this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Identify common conditions and patient presentations that may benefit from general reconstructive surgery.
  • Describe the basic principles and common techniques used in general reconstruction (e.g., skin grafts, local flaps).
  • Explain the pre-operative considerations and post-operative care requirements for patients undergoing general reconstructive procedures.
  • Recognize potential complications associated with reconstructive surgery and initiate appropriate early management.
  • Effectively counsel patients on the realistic outcomes and recovery process of reconstructive surgery.
  • Determine appropriate referral criteria for plastic and reconstructive surgery and communicate effectively with specialists.
  • Access and utilize relevant patient and professional resources related to reconstructive surgery. 

This activity will use a blend of educational methods to ensure effective learning: Illustrated presentations: Using clinical images and diagrams to explain complex surgical concepts and outcomes. Case discussions: Analyzing real-world patient scenarios from initial presentation to post-operative follow-up, emphasizing the GP's role. Expert Q&A panel: Opportunity to ask questions directly to experienced plastic and reconstructive surgeons. Interactive polling/quizzes: To reinforce key concepts and gauge understanding. Provided resources: Handouts summarizing key referral pathways, patient education materials, and relevant guidelines.

The effectiveness of this CPD activity will be evaluated through: Pre- and post-activity questionnaires: Assessing changes in participants' confidence and knowledge regarding general reconstruction topics. Post-activity feedback surveys: Collecting qualitative and quantitative data on the relevance of content, clarity of presentations, effectiveness of teaching methods, and overall satisfaction. Questions will specifically ask if learning objectives were met and for suggestions for future improvements. Informal feedback during Q&A: Monitoring engagement and recurring questions to identify areas needing further clarification or expansion in future iterations. All feedback data will be meticulously reviewed. Recurring themes and constructive criticisms will directly inform revisions to the content, teaching methods, and duration of future programs, ensuring continuous improvement and alignment with GP learning needs.
Core Medical Practice Values

Yes, the program addresses the needs of diverse populations and promotes culturally competent care. Participants will engage with case studies representing patients from different cultural, linguistic, and social backgrounds (e.g., migrant families, Indigenous communities, older adults with limited literacy). The activity includes discussions on:

  • Respecting cultural beliefs and values in care planning.

  • Using interpreters and culturally appropriate communication tools.

  • Identifying barriers to access (e.g., language, stigma, health literacy) and developing inclusive strategies.

  • Reflecting on unconscious bias and its impact on patient outcomes.

By embedding these elements, the program ensures participants gain the knowledge and skills needed to provide safe, respectful, and equitable care for all populations.

Yes, the program explores the root causes of health disparities and provides strategies to address them. Participants will review sample data showing differences in access, outcomes, and patient experience across socioeconomic groups (e.g., lower screening uptake in deprived areas, higher rates of chronic illness in marginalised communities). The activity will include discussions on:

  • Social determinants of health such as income, education, housing, and employment.

  • Structural barriers that contribute to unequal access to care.

  • Practical strategies to reduce inequalities, including targeted outreach, culturally tailored health promotion, and improved care coordination.

  • Reflective exercises encouraging participants to consider how their own practice can help reduce disparities.

Through this approach, the program equips participants with both awareness and practical tools to support equity in healthcare delivery.

the program equips participants with the knowledge and skills to uphold professional standards and codes of conduct by emphasising ethical practice, accountability, confidentiality, and respectful communication in all activities. Participants also engage in scenarios that reinforce applying professional guidelines in real-world situations.

the program addresses ethical decision-making by using case studies to explore dilemmas such as confidentiality, consent, and equity of care. Participants are introduced to relevant ethical frameworks and guided on how to apply them in practice to support responsible and fair decision-making.

Topics Covered
Addiction Medicine
Anaesthetics
Blog Category
Cardiology and Vascular
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Dentistry
Dermatology
Diagnostics and Pathology
Ear Nose and Throat (ENT)
Endocrinology
Events
FAQs Section
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
General Surgery
Genetic
Geriatrician
Gynaecology and Obstetric
Haematology
Immunology and Allergy
Master
Nephrology
Neurology and Neurosurgery
Oncology
Ophthalmology
Orthopedics
Area of Interest
Paediatric
Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery
Program Category
Area of Interest, Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Program Type
Remote
Psychiatry
Radiology
Rehabilitation Medicine
Respiratory
Rheumatology
Sexual and Reproductive Health
Urological Services
Topic
Delivery Method & Format
6.5 Hours total Duration
Remote
Knowledge Sharing: Conference, Lecture (emphasises presenting information and fostering discussion)
CPD Home (Accreditor)
ACSE
Suited for
Practitioners